What is the absolute biggest mistake teams make during IEC 60601-1 compliance testing preparation?
The Topic: IEC 60601-1 mistakes during compliance testing preparation
The Question: I sat down to discuss this with one of our Sr. Electrical Engineer Contractors -
"What is the absolute biggest mistake teams make during IEC 60601-1 compliance testing preparation?"
The Response:
“The biggest mistake I see is:
Treating safety testing as a before-and-after exercise.
Teams instruct the test house to verify performance of a system before and after a stress event—whether that’s an EMC perturbation, a single-fault condition, or a hi-pot application—and consider the test passed if the system maintains basic safety and essential performance post-event.
However, IEC 60601-1 compliance also considers the system's behavior during the stress event.
If basic safety or essential performance is compromised in the transition, even briefly, that’s a hazard, regardless of whether the device recovers.
A device can pass a post-event performance check and still have e.g. delivered an unsafe output or exceeded a leakage limit during the stress event.
For example, an infusion pump that briefly over-delivers during an external electromagnetic perturbation but returns to nominal output afterward should not be considered IEC 60601-1-compliant.”
Solution Strategies:
“The fix can be to add sufficient definition in the test plan:
what signals to monitor continuously during each stress event, and,
what the acceptance criteria are during the transition.
This means instrumented monitoring in real time, not just a snapshot before and after.”
Do you have IEC 60601-1 Testing coming up?
Having issues with your testing now?
Need some assistance?